HOME

SEARCH

SIGN_IN

1 2  View All

"Palooka" New User nothing@nowhere.com Sep 16, 2006, 5:56 PM Post #26 of 29(596 views) Shortcut Re: Winningest hand in poker [In reply to] Can't Post "pokerchimp" <mixthing@se.rr.com> wrote in message news:mg4nt3xmfk.ln2@recgroups.com... > Actually, one of the first computer simulations of Hold Em found the Q7os > was the winningest hand. I will try to find info. > I'm not sure that 'winningest' is a real superlative. Leaving that aside however, I am generally happy to play AA against Q7. Palooka No Karma

"Palooka" New User nothing@nowhere.com Sep 16, 2006, 6:15 PM Post #27 of 29(596 views) Shortcut Re: Winningest hand in poker [In reply to] Can't Post "arlo payne" <arlo_payne@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1158314159$870593@recpoker.com... > > Hell son everyone in the know knows the Royal Arlo is the big money winner > followed by the plan old Arlo. > Don't be confused by those low payoff hands like Aces that win many times but > make little when they do win and cost you a bundle when they get beat. > Overall the Royal Arlo and the Arlo are the best money percentage hands in all > of no limit holdem poker when yoou know how to play them and of course pay your > dues on time each month. > The trouble is though, that knowledgeable RGP readers holding AA, despite the fact that they have raised preflop, will check and fold when they see a flop like 357 or 46T rainbow. On the other hand, I am starting to become suspicious that "pay your dues on time each month" is the real motivation here. Whisper it quietly, but there may actually exist the possibility that 64 is not that good a hand after all. Is this blasphemy? Palooka No Karma

"Studley" New User Studley Sep 17, 2006, 12:15 AM Post #28 of 29(596 views) Shortcut Re: Winningest hand in poker [In reply to] Can't Post 'Actually, one of the first computer simulations of Hold Em found the Q7os was the winningest hand. I will try to find info.' Why do you talk BS like this you spamming POS slob! Q7os the best hand? What a total F*ing dope you are. I'm gonna maybe start a rake free poker blog and talk some winning poker rather than the constant BS spammer puke that goes on hear! I'm sick of it! Studley ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- No Karma

"Studley" New User Studley Sep 17, 2006, 12:18 AM Post #29 of 29(596 views) Shortcut Re: Winningest hand in poker [In reply to] Can't Post More BS from the King of Spammers. Studley From: "Palooka" <nothing@nowhere.com> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:15:31 GMT "arlo payne" <arlo_payne@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1158314159$870593@recpoker.com... > > Hell son everyone in the know knows the Royal Arlo is the big money winner > followed by the plan old Arlo. > Don't be confused by those low payoff hands like Aces that win many times but > make little when they do win and cost you a bundle when they get beat. > Overall the Royal Arlo and the Arlo are the best money percentage hands in all > of no limit holdem poker when yoou know how to play them and of course pay your > dues on time each month. > The trouble is though, that knowledgeable RGP readers holding AA, despite the fact that they have raised preflop, will check and fold when they see a flop like 357 or 46T rainbow. On the other hand, I am starting to become suspicious that "pay your dues on time each month" is the real motivation here. Whisper it quietly, but there may actually exist the possibility that 64 is not that good a hand after all. Is this blasphemy? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- No Karma

Home: Poker: rec.gambling.poker: 1 2  View All