Poker NewsForums
Online Poker News Home Page HOME
 
SEARCH
 
SIGN_IN

 

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page Last page  View All


Joe Long
New User
nospam@spam.com

Sep 16, 2006, 1:21 PM

Post #176 of 181(1703 views)
Shortcut
Re: Coping with the demise of b&m etiquette [In reply to]Can't Post

Jesse wrote:
> Joe Long wrote:
>> Jesse wrote:
>>> Instead of trying to make a living
>>> that way, I might as well go beat up retarded kids for their lunch
>>> money.
>> Beating up the retarded kid is worse than shooting off your mouth
>> affecting the play of hands at a poker table ... but its only a matter
>> of degree. Both are wrong.
>
> As is taking advantage of players who don't know the rules, then
> bitching at anyone who tries to correct their ignorance. By doing that,
> you're essentially demanding the right to play in a rigged game.
>
> Jesse

That's pathetic. Absolute bull hockey. No one is talking about taking
advantage of someone not knowing the rules. Reading the board, your
hand, and knowing what hands can beat yours is part of the game, as is
"one player to a hand." You've gone way overboard trying to defend an
indefensible postition. But I guess that's consistent with being a
loudmouthed jackass and showboater.



--
Joe Long aka ChipRider
Somewhere on the Range
No Karma


Joe Long
New User
nospam@spam.com

Sep 16, 2006, 1:26 PM

Post #177 of 181(1703 views)
Shortcut
Re: Coping with the demise of b&m etiquette [In reply to]Can't Post

James L. Hankins wrote:
...
> Here's an ethical delimma that will make your head hurt: what do you do if
> you're the third player in my situation, you notice it should be a split
> pot, but the error actually helps you out by awarding the entire pot to the
> weakest player still in? Do you say anything? Is this an angle shot?

I'd say so, as ethically you are obligated to point out the error. Once
the action is done and the cards are tabled, "cards speak" and anyone
who sees a pot being awarded incorrectly should speak up.


--
Joe Long aka ChipRider
Somewhere on the Range
No Karma


FellKnight
New User
fellknight@REMOVETHISgmail.com

Sep 16, 2006, 3:15 PM

Post #178 of 181(1703 views)
Shortcut
Re: Coping with the demise of b&m etiquette [In reply to]Can't Post

James L. Hankins wrote:
> "David Nicoson" <bigdavex@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1158421391.520055.116850@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> James L. Hankins wrote:
>>> One time we had a pretty large home-game tournament and it got down to
>>> the
>>> final three players. Several of us who had busted were playing in cash
>>> games but railing the final table when a big hand came up. One hand came
>>> up
>>> where one player had something like AJ and another had A10. The player
>>> with
>>> AJ tabled his hand and the other player tabled his hand, face up for all
>>> to
>>> see, saying something like, "looks like you notched me" then he mucked
>>> it.
>>>
>>> As the dealer pushed the pot to player with AJ, I locked eyes with
>>> another
>>> railbird and realized we were apparently the only two in the room who
>>> recognized that the pot should have been split because the board played
>>> four
>>> cards and the aces in both players' hand played. We both kind of
>>> shrugged
>>> and didn't say anything.
>>>
>>> That situation is kind of a close call, similar to the time Hellmuth
>>> piped
>>> up that one time at the WSOP. But my view of it is that I was a
>>> railbird,
>>> not even at the table, much less in the hand, and it's not really my
>>> place
>>> to correct mistakes like that. Plus, if you try it, it just causes
>>> controversy and problems. So, the best rule in almost all circumstances
>>> is
>>> to just keep your mouth shut.
>> Robert's Rules goes 180 degrees after the showdown. It actually seems
>> like an arbitrary distincion in the context of this discussion.
>>
>> 3. Any player, dealer, or floorperson who sees an incorrect amount of
>> chips put into the pot, or an error about to be made in awarding a pot,
>> has an ethical obligation to point out the error. Please help us keep
>> mistakes of this nature to a minimum.
>>
>> In your case, I'm not even sure that you would qualify as a player.
>
>
>
> I probably don't qualify as a player when I'm playing. :))
>
> But if I was the decider, I'd say the only persons who should say anything
> (in the tournament situation) are the players at the table and the dealer,
> and the floorperson if he/she sees it. In my situation, the third player at
> the table definitely had an interest in whether the whole pot or half the
> pot went to certain players.
>
> Here's an ethical delimma that will make your head hurt: what do you do if
> you're the third player in my situation, you notice it should be a split
> pot, but the error actually helps you out by awarding the entire pot to the
> weakest player still in? Do you say anything? Is this an angle shot?

I don't consider it an angle shot, but I do consider it as the breach of
ethics that it is.

Fell
No Karma


"DaVoice"
New User
davoicergp@cox.net

Sep 16, 2006, 8:36 PM

Post #179 of 181(1703 views)
Shortcut
Re: Coping with the demise of b&m etiquette [In reply to]Can't Post

 
"James L. Hankins" <jhankins5@cox.net[no spam]> wrote in message
news:SDVOg.38024$_q4.25629@dukeread09...
>
> "David Nicoson" <bigdavex@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1158421391.520055.116850@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> James L. Hankins wrote:
>>> One time we had a pretty large home-game tournament and it got down to
>>> the
>>> final three players. Several of us who had busted were playing in cash
>>> games but railing the final table when a big hand came up. One hand
>>> came up
>>> where one player had something like AJ and another had A10. The player
>>> with
>>> AJ tabled his hand and the other player tabled his hand, face up for all
>>> to
>>> see, saying something like, "looks like you notched me" then he mucked
>>> it.
>>>
>>> As the dealer pushed the pot to player with AJ, I locked eyes with
>>> another
>>> railbird and realized we were apparently the only two in the room who
>>> recognized that the pot should have been split because the board played
>>> four
>>> cards and the aces in both players' hand played. We both kind of
>>> shrugged
>>> and didn't say anything.
>>>
>>> That situation is kind of a close call, similar to the time Hellmuth
>>> piped
>>> up that one time at the WSOP. But my view of it is that I was a
>>> railbird,
>>> not even at the table, much less in the hand, and it's not really my
>>> place
>>> to correct mistakes like that. Plus, if you try it, it just causes
>>> controversy and problems. So, the best rule in almost all circumstances
>>> is
>>> to just keep your mouth shut.
>>
>> Robert's Rules goes 180 degrees after the showdown. It actually seems
>> like an arbitrary distincion in the context of this discussion.
>>
>> 3. Any player, dealer, or floorperson who sees an incorrect amount of
>> chips put into the pot, or an error about to be made in awarding a pot,
>> has an ethical obligation to point out the error. Please help us keep
>> mistakes of this nature to a minimum.
>>
>> In your case, I'm not even sure that you would qualify as a player.
>
>
>
> I probably don't qualify as a player when I'm playing. :))
>
> But if I was the decider, I'd say the only persons who should say anything
> (in the tournament situation) are the players at the table and the dealer,
> and the floorperson if he/she sees it. In my situation, the third player
> at the table definitely had an interest in whether the whole pot or half
> the pot went to certain players.
>
> Here's an ethical delimma that will make your head hurt: what do you do
> if you're the third player in my situation, you notice it should be a
> split pot, but the error actually helps you out by awarding the entire pot
> to the weakest player still in? Do you say anything? Is this an angle
> shot?


James, I think the attorney in you is coming out in that last question. In
a tournament situation it is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to stop the mistake from
happening, or call the floorman if it's too late to stop the mistake to have
it corrected. Yes, it is most certainly shooting an angle in a tourney if
you benefit from the wrongful awarding of a pot, even if the award doesn't
go to you. You know better, I think you're just playing Devil's Advocate
here.

Rick


No Karma


Gary Carson
New User
garycarson@alumni.northwestern.edu

Sep 16, 2006, 9:10 PM

Post #180 of 181(1703 views)
Shortcut
Re: Coping with the demise of b&m etiquette [In reply to]Can't Post

 


On Sep 16 2006 7:36 PM, DaVoice wrote:

>
> James, I think the attorney in you is coming out in that last question. In
> a tournament situation it is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to stop the mistake from
> happening, or call the floorman if it's too late to stop the mistake to have
> it corrected. Yes, it is most certainly shooting an angle in a tourney if
> you benefit from the wrongful awarding of a pot, even if the award doesn't
> go to you. You know better, I think you're just playing Devil's Advocate
> here.
>
> Rick

After your recent post claiming to have seen a film that doesn't exist I'm not
sure you should be trying to give ethical advice.


Gary Carson
http://www.garycarson.com



_______________________________________________________________
New Feature: Mark All As Read! - http://www.recpoker.com
No Karma


"DaVoice"
New User
davoicergp@cox.net

Sep 16, 2006, 11:18 PM

Post #181 of 181(1703 views)
Shortcut
Re: Coping with the demise of b&m etiquette [In reply to]Can't Post

 
"Gary Carson" <garycarson@alumni.northwestern.edu> wrote in message
news:1158455428$871424@recpoker.com...
>
>
>
> On Sep 16 2006 7:36 PM, DaVoice wrote:
>
>>
>> James, I think the attorney in you is coming out in that last question.
>> In
>> a tournament situation it is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to stop the mistake
>> from
>> happening, or call the floorman if it's too late to stop the mistake to
>> have
>> it corrected. Yes, it is most certainly shooting an angle in a tourney if
>> you benefit from the wrongful awarding of a pot, even if the award
>> doesn't
>> go to you. You know better, I think you're just playing Devil's Advocate
>> here.
>>
>> Rick
>
> After your recent post claiming to have seen a film that doesn't exist I'm
> not
> sure you should be trying to give ethical advice.
>
>
> Gary Carson
> http://www.garycarson.com

I just omitted attribution. I never intended to claim having seen it
myself. STFU Gary, Jeezus.

RC


No Karma

Home: Poker: rec.gambling.poker:
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page Last page  View All